Hand of God
  • Welcome to Hand of God
    • Getting Started
    • Hand of God Overview
    • Disclaimer
  • Protocol
    • Hand of God Phases
    • Genesis
    • Elysium (Farms)
    • Elysium Autocompounder
    • Elysium Zapper
    • Aiden's Garden
      • Aiden's Garden Payouts and Prizes
    • Sanctum (Boardroom)
    • Purgatory (Bonds)
    • Tokens
    • How to Play? (Strategies)
  • AI agent
    • Introduction
    • Elysium Prompt
    • Sanctum Prompt
    • Contract Modifications
    • The Future
  • About us
    • Our Team
    • Roadmap and Risks
    • Tokenomics
    • Smart Contracts
    • Reporting and Security
    • Hand of God Links and Socials
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. AI agent

The Future

PreviousContract ModificationsNextOur Team

Last updated 2 months ago

Our vision for Hand of God Protocol extends beyond automated AI management to embrace true decentralization. We plan to implement a unique governance system where community members can directly influence the protocol's risk appetite and management style. Through regular weekly voting, users will be able to signal their preference for more conservative or aggressive protocol parameters.

Think of it as a decentralized Federal Reserve, where instead of Jerome Powell making decisions in a closed room with a small committee, every HOG holder gets a say in monetary policy. It's like if Americans could vote on whether J-POW should "send it" or "play it safe" with the money printer - but in our case, it actually works because it's powered by AI and runs on-chain (sorry, Jerome).

The AI system will then adjust its parameter optimization within the boundaries set by community sentiment, creating a perfect blend of algorithmic efficiency and democratic decision-making. This means the protocol can dynamically shift between conservative capital preservation strategies and more aggressive growth approaches based on the collective wisdom (or collective degen energy) of our community.

This governance mechanism represents our commitment to true decentralization, where AI serves the community rather than replacing human decision-making entirely. It's not just about making the protocol autonomous - it's about making it autonomously responsive to its users' desires while maintaining the safety and efficiency of AI-driven management.